Skip to main content

Advancing human-use experience for real-world evidence for the registration of traditional Chinese medicine products in China

Abstract

Background

The registration application of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) products as new drugs often meets the challenges of lacking clinical evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCT). In recent years, China has introduced a new evidence system for the review and approval of TCM products, which proposed using human-use experience (HUE) for real-world evidence (RWE) to support the safety and effectiveness of TCM.

Purpose

This study aimed to comprehensively analyse the regulatory concerns, policy guidances, and approved cases of using HUE to register TCM products.

Methods

Literature search and thematic analysis were conducted to identify and synthesize the regulatory concerns. A documentary analysis of policy guidances was employed to present the evolving regulatory framework for incorporating HUE into TCM registration in China. Case studies of approved TCM products using HUE to support registration were conducted, and the study design, study population, and postmarked requirements of these cases were analyzed.

Results

Four main themes and 12 sub-themes regarding regulatory concerns of applying HUE in the registration of TCM products were identified. The 4 main themes are HUE quality, HUE applicability, HUE governance, and HUE regulation. Six policy documents and seven technical guidances were released to facilitate the application of HUE in TCM registration, founding a practical regulatory framework for TCM product registration. In China, six cases that employed HUE to support registration were approved. Of these, five cases utilized HUE to support direct registration, while one utilized HUE to lay the foundation for subsequent phase III clinical trial. Regarding study design and data types, retrospective observational studies were the predominant approach and electronic health records from the hospital information systems were the most commonly used data source. Among the five cases of direct registration, three relied solely on retrospective observational studies, while two conducted small-sample prospective studies in conjunction with retrospective observational studies.

Conclusion

HUE can be advanced to generate RWE for the safety and effectiveness of TCM products, which provides potential support for registering new TCM products. Leveraging HUE for registration can shorten research and development period, reduce development costs, and promote innovation, ultimately driving the growth of the TCM industry. However, several challenges remain in using HUE to support the registration of TCM products in China, including difficulties in data accessibility, lack of standardized protocols for HUE collection and reporting, and obstacles in transforming TCM preparations from hospitals into new TCM products using HUE. Furthermore, ensuring high-quality HUE requires future attention to data applicability, data infrastructure, and research design.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

The registration application of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) products as new drugs often meets the challenges of lacking clinical evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCT) [1, 2]. TCM products typically include a combination of herbs, animal ingredients, and minerals materials. The methods used in their manufacturing and the standards for quality management can vary greatly from those applied to chemical and biopharmaceutical drugs [3]. Additionally, TCM has a unique theoretical system and approach to diagnosis and treatment, making it difficult to evaluate the safety and efficacy through RCT [2].

In recent years, the concept of real-world evidence (RWE) has gained traction in the field of drug development and regulatory decision-making. RWE, derived from real-world data (RWD), encompasses extensive data sources beyond RCT, such as electronic health records, insurance claims, patient registries, and observational studies [4]. The utilization of RWE has been increasingly recognized for its potential to complement RCT by providing additional insights into the safety and effectiveness of medical products in real-world settings. This paradigm shift has been particularly notable in the regulatory frameworks for chemical and biopharmaceutical drugs, where RWE has been employed to support registration applications and post-marketing surveillance [5, 6]. With thousands of years of history, TCM has amassed vast empirical knowledge and a significant repository of RWD through its application in disease prevention and treatment. This presents an intriguing opportunity for integrating evidence from RWD into its regulatory framework. However, despite the growing acceptance of RWE in the broader pharmaceutical landscape, its application in the registration of TCM products remains underdeveloped and less explored.

The nature of TCM implies its integral requirements of clinical practices [7]. In recent years, China has proposed a new evidence system for the review and approval of TCM products, which emphasized the combination of TCM theory, human-use experience (HUE), and clinical trials (referred to as"Three Combinations") [8]. Of these, HUE refers to a holistic and integrated approach considering the eligible population, clinical targeting, usage and dosage, efficacy and safety profiles, and clinical benefits of TCM formulas or preparations accumulated during clinical practice. Data of HUE is mainly comprised of clinical practice data, which is, in essence, identical to the concept of RWD. Obtaining HUE involves gradually exploring and clarifying real-world data on the efficacy, safety, and clinical benefits of TCM products [9]. HUE can help fill the gaps left by traditional RCTs by offering insights into treatment effectiveness in diverse, real-life populations, capturing long-term outcomes, and reflecting routine clinical practices that RCTs, with their controlled settings and strict inclusion criteria, often overlook [4]. By adopting a comprehensive and systematic approach to incorporating HUE, regulatory authorities can better examine the registration applications of TCM products, ensuring their safety, efficacy, and quality. Furthermore, this integration can potentially shorten the research and development cycle, reduce costs, and enhance the overall efficiency of TCM product development.

While some trial guidance documents are being launched, China is still in the initial and exploratory stage of making better use of HUE to support the development and registration of TCM products. Lin et al. [10] discussed the opportunities and challenges encountered by clinical pharmacists of TCM in the development of new drugs under the"Three Combinations"system. Yang et al. [11] shared considerations about using real-world study and human use experience in research and development of new TCM drugs. However, studies focused on regulatory considerations of HUE are limited. There is an urgent need for regulatory agencies to strengthen the regulatory system of “Three Combinations” by clarifying the requirements and standards of HUE to facilitate the development of TCM.

Therefore, this study aimed to comprehensively analyse the regulatory concerns, policy guidances, and approved cases of using HUE to register TCM products. Specific objectives include: (1) to synthesize regulatory concerns from the published articles related to the use of HUE in TCM products; (2) to identify and examine the policy guidances to present the evolving regulatory framework for incorporating HUE into TCM registration applications in China; (3) to analyse cases where HUE was applied to support the registration of TCM products. It is expected that the findings of this research will contribute to the regulatory science subfield of drug registration to enrich the practices of advancing the HUE for RWE in registration applications of complementary and alternative medical products.

Methods

Research design

The study employed a mix-methods approach, including literature search and thematic analysis of published articles, documentary analysis of government policies and technical guidance documents issued by regulators, and case studies on the use of HUE in the registration applications of TCM products, as shown in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Research design

literature search and thematic analysis

Firstly, we searched the PubMed, Web of Science, CNKI, and WANFANG databases for and included articles related to the application of HUE or RWE in the registration and regulatory decisions of TCM products (The search term identifiers and search strategy were provided in the supplementary table). The exclusion criterion included: (1) commentaries, study protocols, letters, editorial material, and conference abstracts or posters; (2) studies unrelated to registration or regulatory decisions; (3) article content does not involve TCMs product; (4) the language is neither English nor Chinese.

For the included articles, qualitative study findings were synthesized using applied thematic analysis to identify the regulatory concerns of using HUE in the registration application of TCM products [12]. Data was extracted from the aim, results and discussion sections of each article and documented using Microsoft EXCEL. We used a descriptive narrative approach to present the findings according to each theme of regulatory concerns. The synthesis of findings is presented in the results section of this study.

Documentary analysis on government policies and technical guidances

By searching official Chinese government websites, the study reviewed the government policies and technical guidance documents regarding the generation, evaluation, and application of HUE or RWE for registration and regulatory decisions of TCM products. The official sources reviewed included: The State Council, The People’s Republic of China (http://english.www.gov.cn/), The National Administration of Traditional Chinee Medicine (http://www.natcm.gov.cn/), The National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) (https://www.cde.org.cn/) and The Center for Drug Evaluation of NMPA (http://english.nmpa.gov.cn/). We applied documentary analysis to extract information from these documents and summarized the evolving regulatory framework for incorporating HUE into TCM registration applications in China.

Case study

Finally, cases of using HUE to support registrations were collected from official Chinese government websites. Additional searches were conducted to obtain related empirical studies for more detailed information. The following information was extracted from the included case: product name, year of approval, approval institution, type of regulatory decision, classification of TCM registration, and HUE used for registration application. The study design, study population, and postmarked requirements of HUE were further explored. Data extraction from eligible documents and studies was conducted independently by two researchers. Any disagreements between the two researchers were resolved through discussion and with the help of a third researcher. Data were extracted and documented by Microsoft Excel.

Results

Results from thematic analysis of recent literature

Included studies

After a systematic search in the databases, 455 articles were identified. The automatic and manual duplication removal discarded 34 records. After title-abstract screening and full-text assessment, 37 articles related to using HUE to support registration application of TCM were included, of which 4 in English and 33 in Chinese (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Flow-chart of article selection

Regulatory concerns regarding the application of HUE for TCM registration

Using thematic analysis, we identified 4 main themes and 12 sub-themes of regulatory concerns regarding the use of HUE for TCM registration, as shown in Table 1. The 4 main themes include HUE quality, HUE applicability, HUE governance, and HUE regulation.

Table 1 Themes and sub-themes of regulatory concerns regarding the application of HUE for TCM registration

Among these, HUE quality is the primary concern, which was mentioned in more than half of the included literature [11, 13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36]. Quality is a fundamental element in determining whether HUE can be used to support regulatory decisions, and the quality of HUE directly affects the strength of evidence for HUE. Moreover, three sub-themes under the theme of HUE quality were identified: 1) standardized collection and curation of data; 2) appropriate study design and statistical analysis; and 3) report and reasonable interpretation of results. The standardized collection and curation of data are essential for ensuring high-quality datasets. Appropriate study design and statistical analysis are critical for interpreting data collected in real-world settings, establishing causal relationships, testing hypotheses, and generating regulatory-grade HUE to guide policymakers and regulators in decision-making. Clear reporting and reasonable interpretation of HUE findings can further enhance the clarity and completeness of HUE studies.

The applicability of HUE is another main theme, emphasizing the integrity of HUE and TCM products, clear clinical targeting and applicable population, multidisciplinary collaboration, as well as the harmonization and standardization of HUE/TCM terminology. The consistency between HUE and TCM products lies in the alignment of a proposed new drug with practical outcomes observed in HUE. This includes prescription composition, function indications, usage and dosage, preparation method, and primitive medicinal materials [17, 20, 26, 34, 35, 11, 37]. Clinical targeting refers to the indications of the target population of TCM products, which should be accurate. Besides, the applicable population should be clearly defined, including information such as gender, age, disease condition, course of disease, stage, and TCM syndrome. Clear clinical targeting and applicable population are essential for the successful development of new drugs [22, 26, 36, 38]. Multidisciplinary collaboration among stakeholders is also important, as advancing the integration of HUE into TCM registration necessitates collaborations among industry professionals, clinical practitioners, research institutions, and regulatory authorities.

HUE governance and HUE regulation are another two main themes concerned by scholars. HUE governance focuses on the data sources of HUE information, as well as ethical compliance and privacy protection of patient information [15, 16, 18, 22, 35, 39]. HUE regulation emphasizes the optimization of policy and technical guidelines, communication with regulatory authorities, and the post-marketing requirement [24, 30, 31, 40]. Post-market requirement plays a critical role in all phases of a drug's lifecycle. For TCM drugs using HUE to support registration applications, challenges are magnified as HUE often involves greater bias and confounding factors compared to RCT. Therefore, post-market requirements should be strongly emphasized in the approval process, particularly for TCMs containing toxic herbs or incompatible components [29, 41].

Findings from documentary analysis on government policies and technical guidelines

In recent years, China has issued a series of policy and technical guidance documents to guide the research, development, and registration of TCMs, aiming to construct a more holistic evidence system for evaluating and registering TCM products that align with their unique characteristics. Our search on the official Chinese government websites resulted in six policy documents and seven trial versions of technical guidance documents related to the application of HUE. These documents'detailed information and main contents were extracted and summarized in Tables 2 and 3.

Table 2 Government policies regarding the application of HUE for registration and regulatory decisions of TCM products
Table 3 Technical guidelines regarding the application of HUE and RWE for registration and regulatory decisions of TCM products

Three combinations: the novel review and approval system tailored for TCM product

In October 2019, the State Council of China issued the Opinions on Facilitating the Inheritance, Innovation and Development of Traditional Chinese Medicine, which purported to reform and improve the management of TCM registration, optimize the classification of TCM registration, and facilitate the establishment of a review and approval system for TCM registration that integrates TCM theory, HUE and clinical trials [42].

At the end of 2020, NMPA issued the Implementation Opinions on Facilitating the Inheritance, Innovation and Development of Traditional Chinese Medicine, which emphasized the role of HUE in supporting the safety and effectiveness of TCM [43]. The document proposed enhancing the normative collection and curation of HUE and called for the development of methods and technical standards to evaluate TCM efficacy in alignment with its unique characteristics. It also encouraged the adoption of patient-centered evaluation approaches and the exploration of RWE to support TCM registration applications.

Subsequently, additional policy documents were released to further promote the “Three Combinations” system, as summarized in Table 2. In 2023, the Special Provisions for Traditional Chinese Medicines Registration was released [44]. These provisions clarified that HUE, when accompanied by reasonable and sufficient data analysis and correct interpretation of results, could be used as evidence to support registration applications of TCM products. The policies further emphasize the importance of HUE in supporting the effectiveness and safety of TCM. Collecting and synthesizing HUE data to generate reliable evidence that can be employed for assessment becomes a crucial step in TCM research and development.

Classification of TCM registration

According to the Special Provisions for Traditional Chinese Medicines Registration, registration of TCMs is divided into four categories: innovative TCMs, modified new TCMs, compound preparations of TCMs based on ancient classic prescriptions, and TCMs with identical names and formulas (as marketed TCMs), as shown in Fig. 3.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Classification of TCM registration

Innovative TCMs refer to the new TCMs prescription preparations that have clinical value and have not been marketed, and whose prescriptions are not included in the National Drug Standards, National Drug Registration Standards, or Directory of Ancient Classic Formulas of Traditional Chinese Medicines issued by the National Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine. For the registration of innovative TCMs, besides sufficient evidence of effectiveness and safety, randomized controlled clinical trials shall be carried out in principle before being approved.

Modified new TCMs refer to preparations that change the administration route and dosage form of marketed TCMs, with clinical application advantages and characteristics, or added functions and indications. The research and development of modified new TCMs shall have a clear justification for modification. If the new application is to add indications to a marketed TCM with the support of HUE, data on non-clinical efficacy trials are not required.

The third category in the classification is compound preparations of TCMs based on the ancient classic prescriptions, which refer to the prescriptions recorded in ancient TCMs classics that conform to the regulations of the Law of the People's Republic of China on Traditional Chinese Medicines and are still used in current practice, these products often have definite curative effects and have obvious characteristics and advantages. This category adopts the review procedure relying on expert opinions, with HUE playing an important role in supporting safety and efficacy for this category. The review committee of experts, mainly composed of TCM experts, academicians, and regulators, conducts a technical review on the preparation, and gives technical review opinions on whether to approve it for the market.

Information required for HUE

According to the Technical Guideline for Clinical Research and Development of New Drugs of Traditional Chinese Medicine Compound Preparations Based on Human Use Experiences (Trial) released by NMPA, HUE is generated in the process of clinical practice of fixed TCM formulas or TCM compound preparations supported by TCM theory, after the formula ingredients (including base, medicinal site, preparation), dosage, clinical targeting are basically clear, accumulated by a longer period of time and a larger population range of clinical use [45]. HUE primarily comprises of four key aspects of information: (1) the source and evaluation of formulas, (2) essential pharmaceutical data, (3) clinical usage, and (4) clinical practice data (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

The “Three Combinations” review and approval system and information on HUE

The source and evolution of formulas of TCM compound preparations encompass the source of formulas, the underlying TCM theories, formula ingredient’s dosage, dosage form, intended functional indication scope, applicable populations, dosage and administration, treatment duration, and whether they include toxic herbs or incompatible components. Essential pharmaceutical data includes but is not limited to: formula ingredients (including base, application site, and preparation methods), dosage form, preparation process, and its changes and evolution. Clinical usage refers to the complete clinical use of TCM compound preparations from the original formula to the preparation under application and its evolution. It involves details such as the medical institutions where they are used, the initial date of use, the departments involved, the primary target population, the number of patients treated, the doses administered, and adverse reactions. For clinical practice data, primarily originate from clinical records stored in hospital information systems and medical record databases, encompassing structured and unstructured data, and digital and non-digital medical records.

Evidence based on HUE to support TCM development and registration

Based on the registration classification and situations of HUE, NMPA provided several research and registration paths of new TCMs for recommendation in Technical Guideline for Clinical Research and Development of New Drugs of Traditional Chinese Medicine Compound Preparations Based on Human Use Experiences (Trial) (mainly for TCM in 1.1 and 3.2 registration classification), as shown in Fig. 5 [45]. According to the recommended paths, evidence from HUE to support the registration of new TCM can be generally categorized into two categories: direct support for registration and laying the foundation for subsequent clinical studies. For HUE data, following the appropriate study design and statistical analysis, if the results can provide sufficient evidence of efficacy and safety within the proposed functional indication, dosage, and administration, they may directly serve as key evidence to support the product's registration after communication with regulatory agencies, as the Path Five in Fig. 5.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Clinical research and development strategy for TCM products based on human-use experience. Source: National Medical Products Administration. Technical Guideline for Clinical Research and Development of New Drugs of Traditional Chinese Medicine Compound Preparations Based on Human Use Experiences (Trial). 2022

Nevertheless, if the results from the research based on HUE are insufficient to demonstrate drug efficacy and safety or fail to fully and accurately address the scientific questions necessary for marketing approval, further clinical studies are needed to gather more robust evidence (Path Two, Path Three, Path Four, and Path Seven in Fig. 5). When HUE is employed to inform the design of these subsequent studies, several critical elements should be identified through data analysis. These elements include the applicable population, the scope of functional indications, drug dosage and administration, the primary endpoint, the observation period, follow-up points, and specific parameters or effect sizes needed for sample size estimation. Moreover, if the HUE data are of high quality and adequate, their analysis results, alongside the results of subsequent clinical studies, can jointly serve as evidence for regulatory decision-making.

The type of subsequent clinical studies should be decided on a case-by-case basis. If high-quality HUE data are available and the results are positive, a confirmatory RCT or PCT can be initiated directly. Otherwise, exploratory clinical studies must be conducted first. These exploratory studies can be interventional or observational, and their outcomes will guide the decision on whether further confirmatory trials are necessary. It is important to note that clinical research and development of TCM compound preparations should still follow the conventional pathway without any foundation of HUE-based studies.

The cases of TCM using HUE to support registration application

By searching official Chinese government websites and literature, we finally identified 6 cases in which HUE was utilized to support the registration application of TCM products, as shown in Table 4. Of these, Cases 1–5 utilized HUE to support direct registration, while NMPA approved Case 6 to move directly to Phase 3 studies due to prior HUE.

Table 4 Cases of TCM products using HUE to support registration application

Using HUE to support direct registration

Case 1–3: In the process of fighting against COVID-19 pandemic, TCMs demonstrated effectiveness on COVID-19 symptoms alleviation and were widely used to treat COVID-19 patients in China [46]. Due to the synergistic effect of multiple components and multiple targets, TCM offers a comprehensive therapeutic effect in antiviral, anti-inflammatory, antipyretic, and immune regulation functions, thereby having the potential to improve the multiple symptoms caused by COVID-19 [47, 48]. Among them, Qingfei Paidu granules (QFPD), Huashi Baidu granules (HSBD), and Xuanfei Baidu granules (XFBD) are the most effective anti-coronavirus prescriptions used by many clinicians and experts since the outbreak of COVID-19. The three TCM prescriptions are all derived from classical TCM formulas used for symptomatic relief of respiratory illnesses and were included in the National Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment Protocol for Novel Coronavirus Pneumonia by the National Health Commission in 2020 [49]. They have shown great effectiveness in alleviating symptoms and reducing the progression of mild and moderate COVID-19 cases to severe cases. Based on the human use evidence from clinical practice, NMPA approved these three TCM prescriptions through a special and emergency response procedure on March 2, 2021 [50]. This was the first time that HUE was used to support new TCM registration in China.

QFPD was the first prescription that authorities promoted nationwide and also the most widely used one during the anti-epidemic battle in Wuhan. It was derived from a combination of classical TCM formulas, and a systematic review and meta-analysis indicate that it can effectively alleviate symptoms and shorten the recovery time of patients [51]. To support its registration application, a multicenter retrospective observational study of QFDA was conducted to evaluate the safety, treatment pattern, and effectiveness of QFPD in the real-world setting. A total of 3,715 cases were included from over 60 medical institutions across 28 provinces in China, and analyses were conducted on these real-world data to form high-quality HUE [29]. Following Path Five in 3.2 registration classification, QFPD used evidence based on HUE to support direct registration application and received approval from NMPA following a special review and approval procedure under emergent events of public health. After its approval, a randomized controlled trial was conducted to further assess the clinical effectiveness of QFPD [52].

Similar to QFPD, HSBD, and XFBD also received approval following Path Five in the 3.2 registration classification. XFBD was derived from classical formulas that have shown effective treatment of infections by corona viruses [53]. A pilot randomized clinical trial has shown that the disappearance rate of clinical symptoms was significantly reduced (P < 0.05) in the experimental group using XFBD compared to the control group [54]. Besides, a retrospective observational study including 41 cases shows that XFBD has good efficacy and safety in the treatment of severe COVID-19 cases by alleviating inflammation and clinical symptoms, promoting the absorption of lung inflammation, and reducing mortality [55]. After its approval, a prospective, non-randomized controlled trial was conducted to further evaluate the efficacy and safety of XFBD in the treatment of COVID-19 [56].

For HSBD, before its approval, a prospective, single-center, non-randomized controlled trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of HSBD and Lopinavir-Ritonavir treatment in adult patients with COVID-19. The results indicate that compared to Lopinavir–Ritonavir treatment alone, the combination of Lopinavir–Ritonavir and HSBD displayed advantages in terms of the clinical remission time and rate of release from quarantine [57]. Furthermore, a retrospective case series study including 55 severe COVID-19 patients at early stage of the epidemic showed that HSBD can promote lung lesion opacity being absorbed, thereby mediating inflammation [58]. After being approved, a prospective single-center, open-label, randomized, controlled clinical trial was conducted to assess and compare the efficacy and safety of HSBD, Paxlovid, and the combination in treating high-risk patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 Omicron [59]. Additionally, a single-center, open-label, parallel-group randomized controlled trial was carried out to assess the efficacy and safety of HSBD in pediatric patients with laboratory-confirmed mild COVID-19 [60].

Case 4–5: Sanhan Huashi granules (SHHS) was derived from traditional Hanshiyi herbal formula and composed of 20 Chinese herbs [61]. To assess the effect of SHHS on preventing the progression to severe conditions in patients with mild and moderate COVID-19, a retrospective cohort study was conducted at a quarantine station in Wuhan. Patient data were collected through self-reports and follow-ups using a real-time Internet information collection application by the Centers for Disease Control for the Wuchang District. A total of 721 mild and moderate COVID-19 patients were enrolled in the study, and the results showed that SHHS can reduced the progression of mild and moderate COVID-19 to a severe disease status [62]. On 9 Oct, 2022, NMPA approved SHHS in 3.2 registration classification following Path Five [63]. After its approval, a randomized, active-controlled, open-label, multi-center trial was conducted to further compare the effectiveness and safety of SHHS and nirmatrelvir–ritonavir in treating adults with mild-to-moderate COVID-19. The result indicated that SHHS significantly shortened the median time to sustained clinical recovery compared to nirmatrelvir–ritonavir (6.0 (95% CI, 5.0 to 6.0) vs. 8.0 (95% CI, 6.0 to 9.0) d; P = 0.001), particularly for individual symptoms including fever, sore throat, cough and fatigue [64].

Wenyang Jiedu Granules (WYJD, formerly known as Fuzheng Jiedu) is derived from Si Ni Tang and Tou Du San, and was used for the treatment of COVID-19 patients. A retrospective study indicated that the use of WYJD reduced the 28-day mortality (P = 0.049) and shortened the duration of fever (4 days vs. 7 days, p = 0.002) [65]. On 23rd August 2024, WYJD was approved by NMPA following Path Five.

Laying foundation for subsequent Phase 3 clinical trial

Case 6: Antiwei granules was derived from Zhang Zhongjing's “Shang Han Lun”, with the effects of relieving the symptoms of cold and coughing. In 2023, Antiwei granules was approved by NMPA to directly conduct a Phase 3 clinical trial with sufficient prior HUE [9]. This case followed Path Three for its clinical study and registration, which allows for the direct conduct of confirmatory randomized controlled trials if there is sufficient high-quality HUE and positive study results.

Discussion

Regulatory framework for incorporating HUE into TCM registration applications in China

In recent years, China has been actively promoting reform on the regulation of TCM, and released relevant guidelines and policy support to incorporate new methods into the development and evaluation of TCM products. The"Three Combinations"review and approval system, introduced by NMPA, represents a significant advancement in the registration framework for TCM products. This system aims to evaluate TCM products that align with their unique characteristics, and integrates three critical components: TCM theory, HUE, and clinical trial. As a foundational basis for using TCM in clinical practice, TCM theory primarily reflects the reasonable explanation of functional indications, that is, the rationality of"Theory-Diagnosis-Formula-Medicine"[45]. HUE is generally accumulated in clinical practices with certain regularity, repeatability, and clinical value. It encompasses the insights and summaries of usage in specific populations, dosage, efficacy and safety profiles, prescription characteristics, and the clinical benefits of TCM formulas or preparations generated from clinical practice. The inclusion of HUE is particularly noteworthy as it allows for incorporating data from the real world, which can provide insights into the effectiveness and safety of TCM products. This is very important for TCM products as they often have complex mechanisms of action and multifaceted therapeutic effects that may not be fully captured by RCT. It should integrate the TCM theory and summaries of HUE for clinical trials to further conduct studies on unresolved efficacy and safety issues. Various research and development strategies, along with flexible study designs, can be adopted as needed. Based on evidence from HUE, non-clinical effectiveness studies and phase 1/2 clinical trial may be exempted when relevant requirements are met within the “Three Combinations” system. This can potentially shorten the research and development cycle, decrease costs, and enhance the overall efficiency of the research.

Although the use of HUE in the registration of TCM products in China is still in the early stage, the successful cases demonstrated its prospects. By the end of 2024, NMPA approved 6 TCM drugs that used HUE for registration application. Of these, 5 drugs utilized HUE to inform new medicine registration, while one utilized HUE to lay foundation for subsequent Phase 3 clinical trial. Drugs using HUE to directly support registration are typically backed by large-sample retrospective studies or prospective studies, with findings published in academic journals to demonstrate their safety and efficacy. In contrast, drugs utilizing HUE as a foundation for subsequent clinical studies often rely on unpublished research with smaller sample sizes, requiring further trials to validate their safety and effectiveness. For the HUE of approved cases, retrospective observational studies are the main study design, and electronic health records from hospital information system are mostly used data type. Two drugs (HSBD and XFBD) have conducted small sample prospective studies, and submitted applications in conjunction with retrospective observational study for registration. Currently, NMPA has not approved any TCM products to add functions or indications based on HUE. This may be due to the broad indications and function scopes of TCM products. A recent study has investigated the mechanism of indication expansion for Daning tablets under the"Three Combinations"review and approval system [66], while future research should focus more on expanding the application of HUE in regulatory decision-making.

In the aspect of post-market assessment, among these cases approved by NMPA, the first three cases (QFPD, HSBD XFBD) were approved through a special review and approval procedure. This procedure is designed for public health emergencies that pose a threat to people or have already occurred [51]. Although this procedure does not require post-market assessment like the conditional approval designation, all three drugs underwent post-market assessment to further clarify their effectiveness and safety. One possible reason for this could be that these drugs were intended for marketing overseas, but there is no established process for using HUE or RWE for herbal medicine registration in other countries [67]. As a result, evidence from RCT may be necessary for their attempts to gain approval in foreign markets.

Methodological considerations of using HUE to support TCM registration

Data curation and statistical analysis are essential steps to form high-quality HUE evidence. Clinical data of HUE is generally derived from historical or prior sources, such as electronic medical records or past clinical studies. However, these data are often incomplete, with inconsistent standards and description methods, making it challenging for direct analysis. To meet the requirements for generating clinical evidence and the data submission standards, these data must undergo a standardized curation process, in which data curation and data quality evaluation are the major contents [45]. For data curation, the curation of previous clinical data mainly includes but is not limited to: data security processing, data extraction, data cleaning, data conversion, data transfer and storage, and data quality control. In terms of data quality evaluation, it is generally divided into two steps. First, a preliminary assessment determines whether the source data meet the basic analytical requirements, including compliance with ethical review regulations, data security, and privacy protection. This step also evaluates the accessibility of the data, the completeness of key variables, and whether a sufficient sample size can be ensured after curation. Second, the fitness of the data post-curation is assessed, focusing on two main aspects: relevance and reliability. Relevance examines the coverage rate of key variables, the accuracy associated with treatment and clinical outcomes, the representativeness of the target population, and the integration of various source heterogeneous data. Reliability, on the other hand, encompasses several factors such as completeness, accuracy, transparency, quality control, and quality assurance of the data.

Another primary consideration is the study design of HUE research, which must account for the inherent variability and complexity of RWD. Unlike RCT, real-world studies often lack randomization and control groups, which can introduce biases and confounding factors. Therefore, it is crucial to employ advanced statistical methods and study designs, such as propensity score matching, instrumental variable analysis, and sensitivity analyses, to mitigate these issues and enhance the credibility of the findings [68]. Since the data of HUE is mainly comprised of clinical practice data in real-world setting, the guideline documents of RWD and RWE regarding study design and could be referenced for HUE.

Consistency between HUE and TCM products is also important when using HUE to support registration. For TCM products developed based on ancient classic prescriptions, the essential pharmaceutical data submitted for registration should be consistent with the HUE. This includes formula ingredients, preparation methods, application site, dosage form, and preparation process. Moreover, the clinical targeting and applicable population should also be consistent [36].

Ethical and regulatory considerations also play a pivotal role in the methodological framework for using HUE in TCM registration. Ensuring patient privacy and data security is essential, particularly when dealing with sensitive health information. Compliance with regulations is mandatory. Moreover, obtaining informed consent from patients for the use of their data in research is a fundamental ethical requirement.

Finally, the interpretation and reporting of HUE findings require careful consideration. Transparency in the reporting of study methods, data sources, and analytical techniques is crucial to allow for reproducibility and critical appraisal of the research. The use of standardized reporting frameworks, such as the reporting of studies conducted using observational routinely collected health data (RECORD) statement, can enhance the clarity and completeness of HUE studies.

Challenges and opportunities in the application of HUE

Despite some achievements in recent years, substantial challenges remain in using HUE to support registration application of TCM products in China. The primary obstacles include difficulties in data accessibility. Currently, there is still a lack of comprehensive databases for TCM. HUE data is often dispersed across various sources, including different hospitals, individual practitioners and fragmented literature sources, making it hard to compile and curate data systematically [9]. It’s noteworthy that all the six approved drugs mentioned above were authorized for treating influenza symptoms, and their HUE are all collected during COVID-19 pandemic. The pandemic created an urgent need for information to support public health, treatment plans, and vaccine development. This urgency led to many high-quality real-world studies, enabled by multi-collaboration, data sharing, digital health technologies, and innovative research designs [69]. However, with the pandemic's end, conducting high-quality HUE studies faces challenges. These include a lack of large databases in the TCM field and reduced collaboration and data sharing among medical institutions. Therefore, to improve data accessibility, the development of patient registries or research databases, and multi-collaboration needs to be promoted.

Moreover, there is a lack of standardized protocols for HUE collection and reporting. The terminology in TCM is complex and diverse, with different practitioners often using varying terms for similar conditions. Additionally, the composition of herbal ingredients can vary based on their origin, preparation methods, and practitioner interpretation, further complicating the data collection process [70]. Without standardized protocols, the methods of data collection and reporting can differ significantly between studies, leading to variations in data quality and reliability. A researcher from center for drug evaluation of NMPA summarized considerations in reviewing the registration materials of TCM products, which pointed out that most of the HUE materials submitted for drug applications are incomplete, lacking information such as preparation methods, applicable population, and safety data. Additionally, the authors noted that the fitness of the data was not fully considered, especially for retrospective studies [71]. Therefore, standardized protocols for collecting and reporting HUE information are essential to ensure consistency, reliability, and accuracy in both clinical practice and research. Besides, the use of standard TCM terminologies, such as the International Standard Terminologies on Traditional Chinese Medicine introduced by the WHO in 2022, should be encouraged among TCM practitioners [72]. This can significantly enhance the standardization and global harmonization of TCM terminology, and further contribute to the collection and analysis of HUE.

Finally, the role of HUE in transforming TCM preparations from hospital (also called as in-hospital TCM preparation) into new TCM products should be further emphasized. TCM preparations from hospital, as a unique and important form of preparations in China, have a long history of human use and serve as a bridge between clinical experience prescriptions and new TCM products [73]. Generally, these types of TCM preparations are only allowed to be used in the institutions where they are produced, after receiving recordation from the provincial medical products administration. Since the proposal of the “Three Combinations” review and approval system, the idea of transforming preparations used in medical institutions into new drugs based on HUE has been increasingly valued by drug research and development organizations. In the past few years, some TCM preparations from hospital have received recordation with evidence from HUE, such as Toujie Quwen granules and Tianchan Xifeng Granules [9, 74]. Although some progresses have been made, the overall situation in using HUE to support the development and registration of TCM preparations from hospital still awaits further improvement. This includes limited personnel capabilities and suboptimal quality of collected HUE [39, 75]. To promote high-quality HUE research on TCM preparations from medical institutions, more supporting regulations and relevant technical requirements need to be released. Additionally, innovative study designs, such as patient-reported outcomes measurement, may be suitable for the collection and analysis of HUE for TCM preparations from hospital and should be further explored.

Strengths and limitations

The innovative aspect of this study lies in its comprehensive exploration of the regulatory framework for using HUE in the registration of TCM products in China. We systematically reviewed recent articles and identified the regulatory concerns related to the use of HUE in TCM products. By analyzing government policy documents and technical guidelines from the official website, we summarized the evolving regulatory landscape for incorporating HUE into TCM registration applications in China. Additionally, we provide a case study on instances that included HUE in their registration application, which could provide insight into regulators’ thinking as they evaluated the data.

We also recognize that there are limitations in our study. First, applying HUE to support the development and registration of TCMs is still in its infancy, with limited literature and practical examples available. Second, the regulatory concerns regarding the application of HUE for TCM registration were synthesized based on published literature, without incorporating opinions from regulatory authorities. This omission may limit the comprehensiveness of our analysis, as regulatory authorities often provide critical insights into practical implementation and compliance requirements. Finally, our study focuses on policies and cases at the national level, with cases collected from official NMPA government websites. To obtain a more comprehensive landscape of the HUE used in regulatory decision-making, registration documents and information at the provincial level, such as TCM preparations from hospital, could also be included in the future studies.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the application of HUE in TCM product registration represents a transformative shift in regulatory practices. By embracing a comprehensive and systematic approach by integrating the HUE, regulatory authorities can better support the registration of TCM products, ensuring their safety, efficacy, and quality. The insights derived from this study provide a foundational basis for ongoing improvements in the regulatory frameworks, fostering innovation and enhancing the global acceptance of TCM. As the field continues to evolve, collaboration among stakeholders, including regulators, researchers, and industry professionals, will be crucial in advancing the integration of HUE in TCM registration and ensuring that traditional wisdom is complemented by modern scientific rigor.

Data availability

Data is provided within the manuscript or supplementary information files.

Abbreviations

HUE:

Human-use experience

TCM:

Traditional Chinese medicine

RCT:

Randomized controlled trial

RWE:

Real-world evidence

RWD:

Real-world data

NMPA:

The National Medical Products Administration

References

  1. Fei YT, Cao HJ, Xia RY, Chai QY, Liang CH, Feng YT, et al. Methodological challenges in design and conduct of randomised controlled trials in acupuncture. BMJ. 2022;376:e064345.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Sun X, Li L, Liu Y, Wang W, Yao M, Tan J, et al. Assessing clinical effects of traditional Chinese medicine interventions: Moving beyond randomized controlled trials. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12:713071.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Leong F, Hua X, Wang M, Chen T, Song Y, Tu P, et al. Quality standard of traditional Chinese medicines: comparison between European Pharmacopoeia and Chinese Pharmacopoeia and recent advances. Chin Med. 2020;15(1):76.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Dang A. Real-world evidence: a primer. Pharmaceut Med. 2023;37(1):25–36.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Feinberg BA, Gajra A, Zettler ME, Phillips TD, Phillips EG Jr, Kish JK. Use of real-world evidence to support FDA approval of oncology drugs. Value Health. 2020;23(10):1358–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mofid S, Bolislis WR, Kühler TC. Real-world data in the postapproval setting as applied by the EMA and the US FDA. Clin Ther. 2022;44(2):306–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lu L, Ni S, He X, Huang Y, Chen X, Yang Z. From tradition to evidence-base: Leveraging TCM human use experience in modern drug development. Pharmacol Res Mod Chin Med. 2024;13:100535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. An X, Yang X, Ding X, Ju S, Zhang B, Lin Z. Ramulus Mori (Sangzhi) alkaloids tablets for diabetes mellitus: a regulatory perspective. Fitoterapia. 2023;166:105444.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Li P, Wang S, Chen Y. Use of real-world evidence in regulatory decisions for traditional Chinese medicine: current status and future directions. Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2024;58(1):34–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lin ZJ, Wang HN. The opportunity and challenge for the pharmacists of traditional Chinese medicine in new drug development under the new regulatory policy. Chin J New Drugs. 2022;31(9):832–5. (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Yang ZQ, Tang HM, Tang YQ, Du YP, Gao R, Hu SY, et al. Application of real world study and human use experience in research and development of new traditional Chinese medicine drugs. China J Chin Materia Med. 2021;46(22):5987–91. (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Guest G, MacQueen K, Namey E. Applied Thematic Analysis. Thousand Oaks, California 2012. Available from: https://methods.sagepub.com/book/applied-thematic-analysis.

  13. Mohetaer MWS, Chen YW. A comparative study of the application of real-world evidence to support drug approval in China and US. Chin J New Drugs. 2024;33(11):1082–8. (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tang YQ, Yang ZQ, Tang ZA, Yuan WA, Tang JY, Zou C. Guidelines for quality control of human use experience study on traditional Chinese medicine. China J Chin Materia Med. 2024;49(17):4801–4. (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zhao G, Huizhen L, Liang N, Zhang H, Liu B, Che Q, et al. Methodological consideration on combination model of TCM clinical practice guidelines and real-world study. Chin J Exp Tradit Med Formulae. 2024;30(22):87–93. (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lu Y, Shen L, Lu YQ, Liu DN, Wang L, Chen X. The system construction of research and development and management of TCM new drug in medical institutions based on the “Three Combination” review evidence. Chin Pharm Affairs. 2024;38(02):147–51. (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zhi K, Su PL, Liu J, Yu YN, Li B, Xu HY, et al. Research on core assessment indicators for human use experience of traditional Chinese medicine based on Delphi method. Chin J New Drugs. 2023;32(12):1201–5. (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lai H, Wang Z, Li Y, Tang W, Wang B, Sun P, et al. Multi-evidence integration methodology for traditional Chinese medicine: the MERGE framework. Med J Peking Union Med College Hospital. 2024;15(01):172–82. (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lu Y, Shen L, Lu YQ, Chen X. Thinking on clinical key problems during transformation of preparations in medical institutions to innovative Chinese medicines. Chin J Exp Tradit Med Formulae. 2023;29(06):231–6. (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Guo SX, Hu SY. Reflections on the application of the guidelines for clinical development of new traditional chinese medicine compounded formulations based on human use experience. Tianjin J Tradit Chin Med. 2022;39(11):1399–403. (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lu Y, Wang HN. Analysis on the effects of the “three combined” evaluation evidence system on the transformation of traditional Chinese medicine new drugs. Biomed Transform. 2022;3(03):12–4. (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zhu XQ, Cheng JL, Li B, Liu BL, Liu QQ. Exploratory practice and prospect of collecting and collating human experience in TCM medical institutions. Chin J New Drugs. 2022;31(16):1571–3. (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  23. An N, Han L, Chen PY. Reflections on real world research under the evidence system of “three combinations” registration and evaluation of new traditional Chinese medicine. Chin J New Drugs. 2022;31(14):1359–63. (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang Y, Xu XF, Li FF, Wu S, Chu FH, Xu S, et al. Rational application of experience of clinical use of new TCM drugs: Lessons from real-world study. China Food Drug Adm Magazine. 2022;04:35–42. (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  25. He LY, Zhao TY, Liu J, Wang C, Liu BY. Real-world patient registry study in Chinese medicine: a review. World Chin Med. 2022;17(05):595–601. (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Zhou JY, Liu Q. Current situation of human experience of traditional Chinese medicine and the key point of ethical review. Chin Med Ethics. 2022;35(3):282–9. (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Li L, Liu Y, Tan J, Wang W, Yao M, Ma Y, et al. Developing a safety assessment model for Chinese patent medicines based on real-world data. Chin J Pharmacovigilance. 2022;19(01):18–22. (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Li C, Wu CY, Han W. Considerations on real-world evidence for CMC of new TCM drugs. China Food Drug Adm Magazine. 2021;11:103–7. (In Chinese).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Li A, Liu B, Zong XY, Gong ZY, Bai WG, Tian YX, et al. Research and development strategy of ancient famous Chinese medicine and practice analysis of Qingfei Detoxu granules on the market. J Tradit Chin Med. 2021;62(21):1890–4. (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Chen QP, Shao MY, Zhao RX, Bi Q, Cui HY, Lv LQ. Problems and strategies in the research of syndrome type TCM new drugs based on real world data. Pharmacol Clin Chin Materia Med. 2021;37(06):171–4. (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Li M, Shao MY, Fu Y, Zhao RX, Zhao YX, Zhang RR, et al. Discussion on strategies and problems of real world study on new Chinese medicine based on clinical data. Pharmacol Clin Chin Materia Med. 2020;36(05):219–23. (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Sun X, Zhang JH, Wang W, Tan J, Peng XX, Gao P, et al. Formulate technical guidance for real-world studies of traditional Chinese medicine in China to promote the transformation of clinical research of Chinese patent medicine into decision evidence. Chin J Evid Based Med. 2020;20(09):993–9. (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Xing YF, Wang BH, Huang YH. Research progress and data quality control of application of real-world study on clinical evaluation of traditional Chinese medicine. Glob Tradit Chin Med. 2018;11(04):625–30. (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Yu YN, Liu J, Li B, Dang HX. Expert consensus on core indicators for lifecycle value assessment of Chinese patent medicine. China J Chin Materia Med. 2023;48(19):5389–96. (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Tang YQ, Yang ZQ, Ling Y, Du YP, Tang HM, Ni SH, et al. Quality requirements of human use experience research on traditional Chinese Medicine. China J Chin Materia Med. 2023;48(17):4825–8. (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Yang ZQ, Tang YQ, Tang HM, Du YP, Li B, Tang JY, et al. Data collection, quality and evidence formation for human use experience of traditional Chinese medicine. China J Chin Materia Med. 2021;46(7):1681–5. (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Sun Y, Sun GX, Li HD. Human experience in new drug application of traditional Chinese medicine and expansion of new drug application of traditional Chinese medicine. Central South Pharmacy. 2020;18(12):1941–4. (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Lei X, Shang HC, Gao CS, Ouyang HT, Cui TH, Cheng JL. Consideration of clinical orientation in the research of new traditional Chinese medicine. Chin J New Drugs. 2023;32(17):1703–6. (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Mou N, Zhou Y, Gao MJ. Current situation analysis and countermeasures of human experience collection of traditional Chinese medicine in medical institutions. Chin J New Drugs Clin Remedies. 2024;43(08):582–6. (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Li P, Chen YW. Considerations on the support of converting traditional Chinese medicine preparations of medical institutions into new traditional Chinese medicine using real world evidence. Chin J New Drugs. 2022;31(24):2475–80. (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Wang ZF, Xie YM, Tang JY, Zhang JH, Sun X, Yang ZQ. Guidelines for post-marketing research on clinical effectiveness of Chinese patent medicines. China J Chin Materia Med. 2024;49(03):842–8. (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  42. The Central Committee of the Communist Party of China and the State Council. Opinions on Facilitating the Inheritance, Innovation and Development of Traditional Chinese Medicine. 2019. Available from: https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2020-12/26/content_5573463.htm. Accessed 12 Sept 2024.

  43. The National Medical Products Administration. Implementation Opinions on Facilitating the Inheritance, Innovation and Development of Traditional Chinese Medicine. 2020. Available from: https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2020-12/26/content_5573463.htm. Accessed 12 Sept 2024.

  44. The National Medical Products Administration. Special Provisions for Traditional Chinese Medicines Registration. 2023. Available from: https://english.nmpa.gov.cn/2023-02/10/c_896494.htm. Accessed 12 Sept 2024.

  45. The National Medical Products Administration. Technical Guideline for Clinical Research and Development of New Drugs of Traditional Chinese Medicine Compound Preparations Based on Human Use Experiences (Trial). 2022. Available from: https://www.nmpa.gov.cn/directory/web/nmpa/xxgk/ggtg/ypggtg/ypqtggtg/20220505092004149.html. Accessed 12 Sept 2024.

  46. Xia KY, Zhao Z, Shah T, Wang JY, Baloch Z. Composition, clinical efficiency, and mechanism of NHC-approved “Three Chinese Medicines and Three Chinese Recipes” for COVID-19 treatment. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12:781090.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Xu H, Li S, Liu J, Cheng J, Kang L, Li W, et al. Bioactive compounds from Huashi Baidu decoction possess both antiviral and anti-inflammatory effects against COVID-19. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2023;120(18):e2301775120.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Li P, Hu S, Qian C, Yao Y, Li LY, Yang JF, et al. The therapeutic effect of traditional Chinese medicine on inflammatory diseases caused by virus, especially on those caused by COVID-19. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12:650425.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Wang SX, Wang Y, Lu YB, Li JY, Song YJ, Nyamgerelt M, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of novel coronavirus pneumonia based on the theory of traditional Chinese medicine. J Integr Med. 2020;18(4):275–83.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. The National Medical Products Administration. NMPA approves 3 TCM drugs for pulmonary disease. 2021. Available from: https://english.nmpa.gov.cn/2021-03/06/c_598932.htm.Accessed. 20 Sept 2024.

  51. Wang Q, Zhu H, Li M, Liu Y, Lai H, Yang Q, et al. Efficacy and safety of Qingfei Paidu Decoction for treating COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12:688857.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Ling L, Xu Z, Yin F, Zhang Y, Sun Y. Clinical study on the treatment of Qingfei Paidu Granules combined with nondrug therapy for asymptomatic patients with novel coronavirus. Medicine (Baltimore). 2024;103(19):e38016.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Pan X, Dong L, Yang L, Chen D, Peng C. Potential drugs for the treatment of the novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19) in China. Virus Res. 2020;286:198057.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Xiong WZ, Wang G, Du J, Ai W. Efficacy of herbal medicine (Xuanfei Baidu decoction) combined with conventional drug in treating COVID-19: a pilot randomized clinical trial. Integr Med Res. 2020;9(3):100489.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Li XC, Zhang J, Xia WG, Liu QQ, Wang H, Huang M, et al. Clinical observation of Xuanfei Baidu Decoction in treatment of severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). China J Chin Materia Med. 2022;47(13):3667–74. (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Pang WT, Yang FW, Zheng WK, Feng JH, Xu Q, Zhang L. Clinical efficacy evaluation of Xuanfei Baidu Granule in the treatment of Omicron virus infection with COVID-19. Tianjin J Tradit Chin Med. 2022;39(9):1093–8. (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Shi N, Guo L, Liu B, Bian Y, Chen R, Chen S, et al. Efficacy and safety of Chinese herbal medicine versus Lopinavir-Ritonavir in adult patients with coronavirus disease 2019: a non-randomized controlled trial. Phytomedicine. 2021;81:153367.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Wang Y, Lu C, Li H, Qi W, Ruan L, Bian Y, et al. Efficacy and safety assessment of severe COVID-19 patients with Chinese medicine: a retrospective case series study at early stage of the COVID-19 epidemic in Wuhan. China J Ethnopharmacol. 2021;277:113888.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Yu Z, Zheng Y, Chen B, Lv J, Zhu X, Shang B, et al. Efficacy and safety of Huashi Baidu granule plus Nirmatrelvir-Ritonavir combination therapy in patients with high-risk factors infected with Omicron (B.1.1.529): a multi-arm single-center, open-label, randomized controlled trial. Phytomedicine. 2023;120:155025.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Chen J, Tang Q, Zhang B, Yuan S, Chen J, Shen S, et al. Huashi baidu granule in the treatment of pediatric patients with mild coronavirus disease 2019: a single-center, open-label, parallel-group randomized controlled clinical trial. Front Pharmacol. 2023;14:1092748.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Wang MX, Yao CS, Zhao HY, Wang WH, Zhang Y, Luo KK, et al. Component profile analysis of Sanhan Huashi Formula based on UHPLC-LTQ-Orbitrap-MS, GC-MS, and UHPLC-QQQ-MS/MS. China J Chin Materia Med. 2023;48(22):6066–74. (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Tian J, Yan S, Wang H, Zhang Y, Zheng Y, Wu H, et al. Hanshiyi Formula, a medicine for Sars-CoV2 infection in China, reduced the proportion of mild and moderate COVID-19 patients turning to severe status: a cohort study. Pharmacol Res. 2020;161:105127.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. The National Medical Products Administration. Sanhan Huashi Granules Approved for Marketing. 2022. Available from: https://www.nmpa.gov.cn/directory/web/nmpa/zhuanti/ypqxgg/gggzjzh/20221009185648166.html. Accessed 20 Sept 2024.

  64. Zou X, Chang K, Fan G, Zheng H, Shen H, Tang L, et al. Effectiveness and safety of Sanhan Huashi granules versus nirmatrelvir–ritonavir in adult patients with COVID-19: a randomized, open-label, multicenter trial. Sci Bull. 2024;69(12):1954–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Wang Y, Liu Y, Lv Q, Zheng D, Zhou L, Ouyang W, et al. Effect and safety of Chinese herbal medicine granules in patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective, single-center study with propensity score matching. Phytomedicine. 2021;85:153404.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Huang W, Zhao XL, Zhan CS. Research progress of ’ three combinations ’ of Danning Tablets in increasing the indications of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Chin Tradit Patent Med. 2024;46(08):2685–8. (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Zhang B, Pei W, Cai P, Wang Z, Qi F. Recent advances in Chinese patent medicines entering the international market. Drug Discov Ther. 2022;16(6):258–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Liu F, Panagiotakos D. Real-world data: a brief review of the methods, applications, challenges and opportunities. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022;22(1):287.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Talic S, Shah S, Wild H, Gasevic D, Maharaj A, Ademi Z, et al. Effectiveness of public health measures in reducing the incidence of covid-19, SARS-CoV-2 transmission, and covid-19 mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2021;375:e068302.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Zhang Y, Zhang Y. Research status and reflection of standardization of traditional Chinese medicine terminology following the requirements of the real-world research on malignant tumor. J Oncol Chin Med. 2022;4(04):5–9. (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Yang N, Chu XY, Liu BL. Consideration on the clinical review in pediatric drug development of TCM. Chin J Pharm. 2022;53(11):1648–53. (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  72. Han LAI, Moore AL, Xiaodan YAN, Weihong LI. A qualitative analysis of WHO’s international standard terminologies on TCM. Chin Med Cult. 2025;8(1):86-95. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1097/MC9.0000000000000115.

  73. Liu DH, He XL, Ni SH, Tang YQ, Tang HM, Lu L, et al. Pharmaceutical changes and countermeasures for transformation of traditional Chinese medicine preparations in medical institutions into new drugs based on human use experience. China J Chin Materia Med. 2024;49(2):565–8. (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  74. Huang Y, Zheng WJ, Ni YS, Li MS, Chen JK, Liu XH, et al. Therapeutic mechanism of Toujie Quwen granules in COVID-19 based on network pharmacology. BioData Mining. 2020;13(1):15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Zhuo JX, Qiu ZW, Zhou J, Wu YM, Yang ML, Yang ZQ. Evaluation for druggability of traditional Chinese medicine preparations in medical institutions based on human use experience. China J Chin Materia Med. 2022;47(15):4256–60. (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the support of the Centre for Pharmaceutical Regulatory Sciences at the University of Macau, the International Research Center for Medicinal Administration at Peking University, and the National Development Research Center for Licensed Pharmacists at the China Pharmaceutical University. We are also grateful for the warm support from the PIZZA Group at the University of Macau.

Clinical trial number

Not applicable.

Funding

This research is supported by the fundings from the University of Macau (MYRG-GRG2023-00059-ICMS) and the Science and Technology Development Fund, Macau SAR (FDCT) (005/2023/SKL).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

HH, YFL, COLU and SH conceptualized the study. MGX, LWZ, YX, and XWC conducted the collection and analysis. MGX wrote the main manuscript. YX and HH revised the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yunfeng Lai or Hao Hu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

12906_2025_4906_MOESM1_ESM.zip

Supplementary Material 1: Supplementary table. Search term identifiers. Supplementary Table. Search strategy for articles about using RWE for registration and regulatory decisions of TCM products.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xia, M., Xue, Y., Zhu, L. et al. Advancing human-use experience for real-world evidence for the registration of traditional Chinese medicine products in China. BMC Complement Med Ther 25, 174 (2025). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12906-025-04906-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12906-025-04906-x

Keywords